At an
American Library Association conference in 2007, HarperCollins dressed five of
its male young adult authors in blue baseball jerseys with our names on the
back and sent us up to bat in a panel entitled “In the Clubhouse.” We were
meant to demystify to the overwhelmingly female audience the testosterone code
that would get teenage boys reading. Whereas boys used to lag behind girls in
reading in the early grades, statistics show, they soon caught up. Not anymore.
We guys
had mixed feelings about the game plan: boys’ aversion to reading, let alone to
novels, has been worsening for years. But while this certainly posed a problem
for us male writers, we felt that we were being treated as a sideshow.
And so
we turned from men into boys. Though we ranged in age and style from then 30-something
Kenneth Oppel, a writer of fantasies about ancient beasts (“Darkwing”), to
Walter Dean Myers, the 70-something master of street novels (“Monster”), along
with Chris Crutcher (“Whale Talk”) and Terry Trueman (“Stuck in Neutral”), we
easily slipped into a cohesive pack. We became stereotypes, smart-aleck
teammates — and we were very much on the defensive. It was Us vs. Them.
This is
exactly what boys do, in the classroom and in the library, as well as in the
clubhouse. If we’re to counter this tendency and encourage reading among boys
who may collectively resist it, boys need to be approached individually with
books about their fears, choices, possibilities and relationships — the kind of
reading that will prick their dormant empathy, involve them with fictional
characters and lead them into deeper engagement with their own lives. This is
what turns boys into readers.
Given
the rich variety in young adult fiction available today, this might seem easy.
Not so. “We’re in a kind of golden age of books for teenagers — in fact, the
best ones are more satisfying reads than most of the best books published for
adults,” said Donald Gallo, a Y.A. anthologist and retired English professor at
Central Connecticut State University, when I spoke to him by phone. “The
important question is why aren’t boys reading the good books being published?”
He
ticked off the standard answers: Boys gravitate toward nonfiction. Schools
favor classics over contemporary fiction to satisfy testing standards and avoid
challenges from parents. And teachers don’t always know what’s out there for
boys. All true, in my opinion.
There
are other theories. On his Web site, guysread.com, the teacher and
author Jon Scieszka writes that boys “don’t feel comfortable exploring the
emotions and feelings found in fiction. . . . Boys don’t have enough positive
male role models for literacy. Because the majority of adults involved in kids’
reading are women, boys might not see reading as a masculine activity.”
But I
think it’s also about the books being published. Michael Cart, a past president
of the Young Adult Library Services Association, agrees. “We need more good
works of realistic fiction, nonfiction, graphic novels, on- or offline, that
invite boys to reflect on what kinds of men they want to become,” he told me.
“In a commercially driven publishing environment, the emphasis is currently on
young women.” And then some. At the 2007 A.L.A. conference, a Harper executive
said at least three-quarters of her target audience were girls, and they
wanted to read about mean girls, gossip girls, frenemies and vampires.
Naturally,
authors are writing for this ready group. The current surge in children’s
literature has been fueled by talented young female novelists fresh from M.F.A.
programs who in earlier times would have been writing midlist adult fiction.
Their novels are bought by female editors, stocked by female librarians and
taught by female teachers. It’s a cliché but mostly true that while teenage
girls will read books about boys, teenage boys will rarely read books with
predominately female characters.
Children’s
literature didn’t always bear this overwhelmingly female imprint. Like most
readers growing up in the 1940s and ’50s, before the advent of the Y.A. genre, I
went directly from children’s books about explorers to Steinbeck and Hemingway.
But my son, Sam, a novelist who grew up in the ’70s, was able to go from
“Goodnight Moon” to the burgeoning category of Y.A. literature.
The
books that Sam read differed from the current crop in one significant way: They
tended not to be gender-specific. Many early Y.A. writers were women who wrote
well about both genders, like the queen of coming-of-age lit, Judy Blume (“Forever”). Others wrote
under the guise of asexual initials: S. E. Hinton ("The Outsiders") and M. E. Kerr
(“Gentlehands”). The better male writers also wrote about both boys and girls:
John Donovan (“I’ll Get There. It Better Be Worth the Trip”), Paul Zindel (“The
Pigman”) and Robert Cormier, my hero in the field and author of the 1974
classic, “The Chocolate War.” To me, that book exemplifies what’s currently
missing: here was a tale of fascistic adults and teenage bullying at a Catholic
boys high school, and, controversially and crucially, it lacked a redemptive
resolution, one of Cormier’s trademarks.
But the
next spate of Y.A. fiction tended to be simplistic problem novels that read
like after-school specials, and soon split along gender lines. Books with story
lines about disease, divorce, death and dysfunction sold better for girls than
did similar books for boys. The shift seemed to fundamentally alter the Y.A.
landscape.
To me
and I think to many prospective readers, today’s books for boys — supernatural
space-and-sword epics that read like video game manuals and sports novels with
preachy moral messages — often seem like cynical appeals to the lowest common
denominator. Boys prefer video games and ESPN to book versions of them. These
knockoffs also lack the tough, edgy story lines that allow boys a private place
to reflect on the inner fears of failure and humiliation they try so hard to
brush over. Editors who ask writers of books for boys to include girl
characters — for commercial reasons — further blunt the edges.
The
argument over boys’ reading is not just about gender. This is business, not
prejudice. Why publish books if they never reach prospective readers? That many
of the edgy books boys would like to read are either not taught or are banned
does nothing to promote the cause.
This is
why I felt compelled to describe, at the 2007 A.L.A. conference, my
interactions with readers of my 2006 novel “Raiders Night,” a book frequently
banned by male principals and superintendents (many of them former coaches) for
its depiction of the drug and hazing underside of high school football. But the
boys who read it are quick to relate to its touchy subject matter. At one
school I visited in suburban Chicago, a female teacher, working with a female
librarian, had been slipping “Raiders Night” to dozens of boys, mostly
athletes.
These
“reluctant” readers were eager to talk to me about their reading experiences.
They talked about not trusting coaches who, they said, send you in hurt, and
lie about your playing time and play you off against your friends. They felt
trapped — they loved the fellowship, the physical contact, the prestige of the
game. They even talked, gingerly, about playing because Dad wants you to and
how you could be kept in line by the fear of being called a girl or gay. This
was hard-core boy talk, but it was also book talk — the fictional characters we
were discussing allowed us the freedom to express feelings the way girls do.
Would this conversation ever have taken place without a literary impetus?
A
number of boys thought the book’s ending, in which the hero makes what I
considered the moral choice of protecting the weak and not the team, was
“messed up.” A real jock, they told me, does whatever he needs to do to win,
and right or wrong has nothing to do with it.
I told
them I had a reading list for them.
No comments:
Post a Comment